<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BoxOnline: results since 1999 &#187; Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxonline.com/wp/tag/results/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxonline.com/wp</link>
	<description>Delivering Products That Improve Your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Investment Evaluation Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.boxonline.com/wp/in-the-news/investment-strategy-27</link>
		<comments>http://www.boxonline.com/wp/in-the-news/investment-strategy-27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suggestions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxonline.com/in-the-news/investment-strategy-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been asked many times for a guideline when it comes to evaluating investments that we (or our Clients) make. People ask why we invested in Company X and not in Company Y, Why are we interested in industry A more than industry B etc. Well, the simple truth is that we invest to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been asked many times for a guideline when it comes to evaluating investments that we (or our Clients) make. People ask why we invested in Company X and not in Company Y, Why are we interested in industry A more than industry B etc.</p>
<p>Well, the simple truth is that we invest to win.</p>
<p>We tend to strip out a lot of soft factors and focus on results.<br />
Did management deliver?<br />
Can they do it again?<br />
A lot of investment decision making is based on an understanding of industry trends, a trusted relationship with players that perform consistently above industry average and some form of defensible proprietary technology that is in demand because it solves a specific pain for a given market segment.</p>
<p>If a company has a specific target market segment in their crosshairs, we know that they have done their homework &#8211; when management states that they serve all industries, our alarm bells start ringing.</p>
<p>Following is my personal guideline for what really counts when considering investment in a startup or early stage company.</p>
<p>1) Market potential<br />
2) The Team<br />
3) Results<br />
4) USP</p>
<p>Investment Process</p>
<ul>
<li> The success of investment in an early stage company depends on people and their ability to execute on a detailed business plan, therefore a lot of emphasis is placed on the team.</li>
<li> The structure of the investment is vital and requires creative and often complex terms.</li>
<li> Pricing is a key factor which needs to be carefully analyzed and negotiated.</li>
<li> An interesting exit strategy is required in order to maximize a timely return.</li>
</ul>
<p>Investment Selection</p>
<ul>
<li> Management Team: Experienced, in-depth knowledge of business, results oriented.</li>
<li> Innovative Products/ Proprietory Technology: Highly differentiable, superior, specialized expertise, meets market needs.</li>
<li>Business Plan/ Milestones: Well thought out business plan including milestones and contingency plans.</li>
<li>Substantial Investment Position: Ability to obtain a substantial investment position, influence the selection of executive management and the strategic direction of the company.</li>
<li>Valuation: Negotiate and obtain a fair pricing structure.</li>
</ul>
<p>Initial Investment Valuation</p>
<ul>
<li> Underlying industry assumptions</li>
<li> Realistic income statement over 3-5 years</li>
<li> Competition</li>
<li> Major criteria:
<ul>
<li> Technology value</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> Capital requirements</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> Market potential</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> Capital structure</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> Operational cash flow</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Determination of NAV for privately held startup companies</p>
<ul>
<li> The original cost: An approximation of the fair market value at the time of the transaction.</li>
<li> Write off: NAV calculation at cost, less any write-off deeemed necessary if subsequent performance fails to meet business plan forecast.</li>
<li> Capital increase:  NAV calculation in principle based on the capital increase price, less 10% to 29% discount if deemed necessary based on valuation factors.</li>
<li> Write up: A write up is recognized when a significant event occurs such as increased profitability and achievement of milestones.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boxonline.com/wp/in-the-news/investment-strategy-27/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

